What others publish about you carries the weight.
You can say your work matters. A national outlet quoting you on a live story says it for you, and that is the sentence that ends up in the funding panel's briefing.
Hi Professor,
What Press and Recognition has produced for academics and researchers we work with:
▋
3 hrs
The window on a reactive comment. Speed is the entire game.
3 angles
You can genuinely own. Credibility comes from range control, not availability.
1 list
Source list placement changes everything. Newsrooms keep short rosters of trusted researchers.
Coverage is borrowed authority
A named quote in a publication your funders already read does more for credibility than a year of self published posts.
It compounds with every other channel
Each feature is reused in your profile, your speaker pack and your grant narratives, which is why we run PR alongside publishing rather than instead of it.
Owned media has a ceiling.
Everything on your profile is self published, so a sceptical reader discounts all of it.
Journalists cover your field weekly and call the same three researchers because those three are easy to reach and quotable.
Conference committees and funding panels programme from name recognition, and name recognition comes from third party coverage.
Nothing on your site collects your existing coverage, so each mention disappears the week it publishes.
The Press and Recognition process, step by step.
Angle development
We define the three or four stories you are genuinely the right person to comment on, and the ones you should decline. Credibility comes from range control, not availability.
Media list and briefing
A named list of journalists, producers, trade editors and podcast bookers covering your field, with a one page briefing pack on you that a producer can act on in ninety seconds.
Reactive commentary
We monitor live stories and journalist requests daily, draft your comment within the news window and place it. Speed is the entire game here.
Proactive placement
Pitched features, contributed articles in trade and policy publications, and support preparing peer reviewed submissions where they strengthen the record.
Bookings
Podcast appearances and conference or panel slots, pitched, negotiated and prepared for, including question prep before each recording.
Press page
Every placement collected in one page on your own domain, so the record survives paywalls, link rot and the news cycle.
Everything, done for you.
Fifteen minutes to approve a comment when a story breaks, plus prep calls before bookings.
If you need approval from a communications department for every quote, tell us early so we can build the approval step into the news window.
- Angle set and message discipline documented
- Named journalist, producer and editor list for your field
- Media briefing pack and headshot direction
- Daily monitoring of live stories and journalist requests
- Drafted commentary placed inside the news window
- Podcast and conference pitching, booking and prep
- Contributed article writing and placement
- Press page built and maintained on your domain
What actually happens, and when.
Clinical academic, 18 years in translational neuroscience
Recognised inside the field, unknown to policy and industry and never quoted outside the department seminar.
Positioned as the researcher who can explain diagnostic risk and adoption to non specialist audiences, with commentary placed on live diagnostics and safety stories.
Two policy advisory invitations, a funder board seat and ongoing industry advisory work.
What academics and researchers ask before starting.
No firm honestly can, and any firm that does is buying placements. What we control is angle quality, response speed and relationships, which is what produces coverage consistently.
Let us show you what this would look like for your name.
One call. We review your current position, tell you honestly whether Press and Recognition is the right channel for you, and show you the first three moves.