Every follower you have on LinkedIn is rented. An email list is the only audience you own outright. We either build yours from zero or take over the one you already have and never have time to send, on whatever platform and whatever cadence you want.
Hi Professor,
What Newsletters has produced for academics and researchers we work with:
▋
New list from zero, or we take over yours.
You choose the cadence, we run it.
Of the list, data and archive stays yours.
Four hundred of the right readers outperform forty thousand strangers. We build the list from people who can actually fund, appoint or invite you.
No feed, no ranking, no reach penalty. The people you want reading your work receive it.
Ten thousand followers and no way to reach any of them directly the day a grant deadline moves.
The people who matter most, two programme officers and a prospective co investigator, are buried in a follower list you cannot query.
Nothing on your profile converts a reader into a contact you can follow up with.
Every post starts from zero reach instead of building on the last one.
If you already have a newsletter we audit it: list health, deliverability, open and click history, format, cadence and archive, then tell you what to keep and what to change. If you have nothing, we start from the blank page and design the publication with you.
We agree the shape of the send and how often it goes out. Weekly research note or monthly briefing. Whatever you commit to, we produce it and hit the date, because the calendar is our job and not yours.
beehiiv, Substack, Kit, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Ghost or your institution's approved stack. We set it up properly, or migrate your existing list and archive across without losing subscribers, deliverability or history.
A short, genuinely useful asset only you could write: a methods primer, a funding landscape briefing, a review of where a field actually stands.
Hosted capture page, list infrastructure, consent handling and deliverability set up properly so your sends land in the inbox rather than promotions.
We research, draft, edit and schedule every issue in your voice, from your voice notes, papers and slides or from what is moving in your field. You approve on your phone. Weekly or monthly, the standard does not drop.
Peers, funders, industry and press tagged separately, so a grant announcement, a paper and a commentary opportunity each go to the right subset.
We place you in newsletters your funders and collaborators already read, which is the fastest legitimate way to add several hundred qualified subscribers.
Thirty minutes a month reviewing the send. The lead magnet takes one interview.
If you have no intention of ever emailing your audience, skip this and put the budget into LinkedIn and PR.
A growing LinkedIn audience with no way to contact anyone directly.
A frontline briefing on what actually happens between bench and bedside, sent monthly, with a research translation checklist as the capture asset.
A list read by health journalists and policy leads, producing media features and select committee invitations.
Yes. Consent is explicit, the source of every subscriber is recorded, and unsubscribe handling is built in from day one.
One call. We review your current position, tell you honestly whether Newsletters is the right channel for you, and show you the first three moves.