Boards, founders, programme chairs and recruiters check LinkedIn before they call anyone. For most doctors that page is a CV with a headshot. We turn it into the reason the conversation happens.
Hi Doctor,
What LinkedIn has produced for doctors we work with:
▋
A founder spends on your profile before deciding whether to message you.
Board searches start on LinkedIn before anyone reaches out.
Ghostwritten posts a week, each approved by you before it publishes.
When the right people start messaging you, the power dynamic shifts. You are no longer pitching; you are selecting which invitations to accept.
Posts stay searchable. Work published in month two is still producing introductions in month nine, which is why this is the primary channel.
The headline states a job title, so the reader learns your employer and nothing about your judgement.
The About section reads as a career summary written for a hiring manager who no longer exists.
There is no recent activity, so a founder checking you has nothing to react to and no reason to message.
The few posts that exist are announcements: conferences attended, papers published, congratulations offered.
Everything is true and nothing is memorable, so the invitation goes to the doctor who is easier to describe.
Ninety minutes on the phone. We map what you actually know that others do not, which rooms you want to be in, and the claims you are willing to defend in public. Everything downstream comes from this call.
Headline, About, featured section, experience entries and banner rewritten as a positioning asset. Written so that a HealthTech founder, a board secretary and a conference chair each find the sentence that matters to them within eight seconds.
A running set of themes you own, mapped to a monthly calendar. Two to five posts a week: clinical judgement applied to industry questions, commentary on what your field is already arguing about, and occasional first person accounts that only a practising doctor can write.
We draft, you approve. Either we generate from what is trending in your specialty and write it in your position and voice, or we work from voice notes, slides and papers you already have. Whichever you prefer. Nothing publishes without your sign off.
Comments and connection activity aimed at a named list: the founders, investors, chairs and recruiters who issue the invitations you want. Visibility with the wrong audience is noise. This is the part most people skip and it is the part that converts.
Monthly report on reach, profile views, search appearances, follower quality and, most importantly, inbound conversations. We drop what does not move those numbers and double the themes that do.
One 60 minute call a month, plus roughly 20 minutes a week approving drafts from your phone.
If you want follower count as the outcome, we are the wrong firm. We optimise for who is reading, not how many.
Headline read Consultant Physician at a named hospital. Roughly 500 followers, last post fourteen months old, no inbound.
Repositioned around what breaks when clinical workflow meets software, published three times a week on triage, documentation burden and where HealthTech products fail in the ward.
Grew to 11,700 followers and moved into a role with a four times salary increase within 90 days.
Your input: the week one session and a 15 minute review. Everything else runs without you. Volume scales with the engagement you choose; the rhythm stays the same.
Here is what each stage of the engagement puts on the board. Ranges reflect what comparable doctors have reached, not a guarantee.
With almost none of your time.
Yes. Every engagement starts with a voice interview, and we work either from what is trending in your field written in your position, or from material you record and send us. You approve every draft before it publishes, and the first month is deliberately slow while we calibrate.
One call. We review your current position, tell you honestly whether LinkedIn is the right channel for you, and show you the first three moves.